G20 ministers to back big bank capital surcharge
* G20 set to stop short of mandatory commodities position
limits* G20 discuss strengthening FSBBy Francesca Landini and Huw JonesPARIS/LONDON, Oct 15 (Reuters) - Finance ministers and
central bankers from the world’s top economies are set to back a
mandatory capital surcharge on big lenders of up to 2.5 percent
to be phased in from 2016.A draft communique from a meeting of G20 finance chiefs
endorses a 1-2.5 percent capital surcharge on top banks like
Goldman Sachs , HSBC , Deutsche Bank
and JPMorgan Chase .The aim is to make sure they have enough capital to
withstand market turbulence so that taxpayers won’t have to
rescue banks again in the next crisis.A summit of the G20 leaders in Cannes, France in early
November is set to give final approval to the surcharge plan and
name the banks affected, known as global systemically important
financial institution or G-SIFIs, G20 sources said.”Now that the framework applicable to G-SIFIs is agreed, we
urge the Financial Stability Board to define the modalities to
extend expeditiously the framework to all SIFIs,” the draft
communique obtained by Reuters said.Insurers are battling against a surcharge as second tier
banks.The charge — which will be in addition to a 7 percent
minimum core capital buffer being phased in for all banks from
2013 — is part of a wider package the G20 ministers are set to
endorse on Saturday.The other elements include common “tools” for supervisors to
wind up ailing banks, compulsory “living wills” or resolution
plans for every big bank, and more intensive supervision for
large lenders, the communique said.The FSB, which formulates and coordinates financial
regulation on behalf of the G20, has already drawn up criteria
to determine which banks face a surcharge.It has said 28 banks would be affected if the regime was
introduced immediately but G20 sources said the Cannes summit
may name up to 50 lenders.POSITION LIMITSThe FSB is also expected to update ministers on its work to
define the so-called shadow banking sector before thrashing out
recommendations next year to regulate it.Supervisors fear that as banks face tougher rules, risky
activities could migrate to other parts of the financial system
such as money market funds and special vehicles.G20 presidency France appears to have lost its battle to
introduce tough curbs on what it sees as speculation in food and
energy commodity markets by imposing limits on the size of
positions a trader can hold at any given time.G20 sources said the group was expected to approve a report
from the International Organisation of Securities Commissions,
which groups national market watchdogs, on the benefit of
imposing trading limits but it would remain “optional”.The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is set to
discuss fixed limits on Tuesday but in Europe there is no
consensus, with Britain opposed to such permanent curbs.STRONGER FSBBank of Italy Governor Mario Draghi is expected to propose
strengthening the FSB, which he chairs, in order to ensure
proper implementation of a welter of new rules the G20 has
pledged to introduce, including the bank capital surcharge.Draghi, who steps down as chairman this month to become
president of the European Central Bank, is expected to propose
more members from emerging markets and developing countries on
the FSB’s agenda-setting steering committee.Some Asian and Latin American countries feel the regulatory
measures now being finalised plug supervisory holes in European
and U.S markets and want their circumstances to shape future G20
regulatory work.Draghi also wants representatives of finance ministries on
the steering committee to add political clout.”Draghi will also discuss the possibility to give FSB a
legal personality and to allow it to receive resources from more
diversified sources,” a G20 source said.Saturday’s meeting will also touch on who will replace
Draghi. Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney is seen by some G20
officials as the main contender so far that the Cannes summit
will endorse.G20 ministers are also expected to look at proposals to
reinforce non-binding draft principles on financial consumer
protection authored by the OECD which have been criticised for
being too weak.